Wow! I can tell school has started by looking at the date of my last entry! Somehow the entire month of September has slipped by! Tick... Tock....
Today I'm in the mood to vent. So, like I want to talk about words and language, and all the changes that I've noticed in the last couple of decades or so in the way people talk. Students and adults around me, certainly, but also public speakers on TV are speaking differently than they did in my youth. There have been changes in my lifetime, and I think they are noteworthy.
Hubs and I watch a lot of shows on HGTV: House Hunters, Property Brothers, Love It or List It, Flip or Flop - just to name a few. We've noticed on those shows many home buyers and realtors now talk about the "price point" of a house. At first, I thought a price point was more of a range, but the more I hear it used, the more I think people are using it to refer to a specific price. Example: "I want to buy a house at the $250,000 price point." I am curious when this phrase started being used, and why it was necessary. Why can't people just say, "I want to buy a house that is (about) $250,000"? Or, "My budget is $250,000." Do any of you know where "price point" came from and how its intended use is different than what we were already saying? Google Books Ngram Viewer shows its use sharply rising as of 1980. What happened in 1980 to cause people to start using the phrase?
The word "venue" is another new one to me. I became aware of this word in the '90s when people started talking about music venues - places where concerts were being held. When I attended the Carpenters concert at a basketball arena on the west side of Cleveland, I didn't hear the word "venue" being used. I don't remember the name of the stadium, but I mention the concert because it was the first pop concert I attended, and I'm pretty sure it was in the late 1970s. I looked at the word on Google Book's Ngram Viewer, and it shows the use of the word increasing significantly between 1960 and 1980, but then skyrocketing sharply about 1980. Why?
At some time in the last 50 years, people who work in the hair care industry have gone from talking about "hair care products" to simply "product". Example, "How much product do you use on your hair?" or "I don't like to use a lot of product on my hair." Is this just shorter and easier? Is this a word that used to be used by industry insiders and now has spread to consumers as well?
Now we come to some pet-peeves: Just in the last few weeks, I've made a conscious effort to notice all the people on TV who begin an explanation with "so".
Here is an example:
Interviewer: What inspired you to write this newest book?"
Interviewee: "So I've always been interested in the history of...."
"What got you started making this product?"
"So, I was working with my son on a school project..."
It seems like I hear this almost everywhere on TV now: The News, SharkTank, The Daily Show, The Tonight Show. At first it was mostly teens and 20something people, but now I'm hearing it with a middle-aged group, as well. I'm also not just hearing it from average citizens, but from professional writers, politicians and celebrities. Where did this come from?
Sometimes "so" is combined with the old Valley Girl use of "like":
"So, like, I am working on a new movie...."
Sometimes there is a "yeah" thrown in too: "Yeah, so, like I I took a trip to Europe and I saw..."
Now there is another variation on "yeah...." where it is used with "no", and that often has a sarcastic tone to it:
"So, like, do you want to go to the party with HER?"
"Yeah.... NO, I thinkin'... not so much!
Thinking about all these random words being thrown in is making my head spin. It's also reminding me that when I teach Speech next semester, I might have even more crap language to eradicate from my student's speeches than just "like".
This whole topic is a good example of how language evolves, and many times we have no idea where or why the changes begin. Readers? What say you? Please share your thoughts with me. What new words are YOU hearing?
Thanks for reading, and don't forget to feed the fish! They weren't fed for the entire month of September!
For many years, Hubs and I have purchased colorful hanging baskets for our summer patio with the intention of attracting hummingbirds. We have been successful in getting to see the little flying-wonders occasionally, but not with as much frequency as we would like. We found the plant that seemed to attract them most was fuchsia. Here are some examples of what that looks like:
Indeed, even quite apart from attracting hummers, these are lovely hanging baskets that remain colorful all season and seem hardy and heat-tolerant.
This spring, we were in one of our favorite stores, The Andersons General Store. (I apologize now to those readers who don't have this store near you. There are 2 in the Columbus area and 3 in Toledo where it is based.) Anyway, we were in the pet department so Hubs could pick up some birdseed, and there was a large display of hummingbird feeders. I spent some time looking at them and reading the little tags, and I decided to get one. I'm not sure why I've lived 55 years on this planet without getting one of these, but let me tell you, my life has been changed forever by the addition of this to my world.
The first one I bought was a Perky Pet brand that looks like this:
This is called a "pinch-waist" feeder, and mine looks exactly like this except that the little yellow cages are rounded. It came with a little packet of powder mix to make the nectar. I mixed it up with water as the directions indicated, filled up my jar and hung it on a plant hook outside the porch at New House. It wasn't long before a hummie came to partake of the sweet nectar. This packet of powder had red food coloring in it. One packet filled the jar, and I left it out for about 2 weeks (this is a mistake which I will address later).
Once we saw that the feeder was attracting hummies, we decided we were going to need to buy more nectar. On a shopping trip to Meijer, we found jugs of red liquid food in the pet department, so I tried that.
I cleaned out my feeder and filled it with this red liquid. Then I watched as a hummie came, checked it out, and quickly went away. Sadly then we waited for a few days and had no more hummies sipping.
Meanwhile Hubs decided he wanted a feeder for Old House, so he got one that was different than the first one. This one looks similar only it doesn't have perches by the feeding tubes. There are lots and lots of feeders on the market. Some are more decorative and artsy and some are more utilitarian. Personally, I prefer a feeder with perches because some hummies will sit for awhile and that is fun to see.
We have a bird supply store here in Westerville called Wild Birds Unlimited. I called them and explained the situation and the lack of interest in the liquid nectar. The clerk explained that hummers don't typically like the store-bought liquid because it has preservatives in it. She recommended powder and said they sell it, so we went to get some. In the store, the clerk recommended a can of powder they sell that is called "Songbird Essentials". One of its selling points is that it makes clear nectar. The clerk explained that some people feel the red food coloring is not good for the hummies - and it really isn't necessary. The red on the feeder is what attracts them. In fact, you will see that almost all commercial hummingbird feeders have red parts. So, I bought a can. A 24 oz can makes 4.5 quarts of nectar, and that's a lot when you consider that you only put about 1/4-1/2 cup in a feeder at a time.
In talking with the clerk we learned some other valuable information. She explained the importance of cleaning the feeders and changing the nectar often, especially in hot weather, because the sugar water goes bad and the feeders can get moldy - neither of which are healthy for the hummies. She said that the water should be changed at least every few days, and even daily if it is really hot. After learning that I realized that it really isn't necessary to fill the feeder completely because they can't drink it down before it needs to be changed. Now I only fill it about 1/4 full - not even up to the pinched waist.
Hubs put his feeder out at Old House filled with this same canned nectar and had success with hummie visitors. He also did some research online about home-made nectar because he didn't really want to keep spending $10 per can. He learned that you can make your own nectar very easily.
Recipe: 4 cups of water - bring to a boil on the stove. Remove from heat.
Add 1 cup of sugar and stir until dissolved. Allow to cool to room temp before putting in feeder.
This can be kept in the refrigerator for 2 weeks. Be sure to bring nectar to room temp before putting out in feeders.
Also we heat our water in a metal pan that is NOT coated with non-stick coating. When Hubs was just a young-'un, he had a pet parakeet, and he learned then that birds can be sensitive to the fumes from that non-stick coating. If a pan with a non-stick coating is left hot and dry on the stove, the fumes can kill a pet bird. (Normal cooking shouldn't be a problem.) We have chosen to keep our sugar water as natural as possible rather than take chances.
In the couple of months that I've had a hummie feeder, I've too often seen the sad sight of a hummie coming to the empty chain while the feeder is inside being cleaned and refilled. They sit on the chain and look around.... and fly around looking for the feeder. I decided to get a second one, so that I could have it ready to put out immediately when the first one is taken in for cleaning. Then I don't have to rush and the hummies don't have to wait. Here is the 2nd style I got:
The only reason I bought this was because I couldn't find another like the first one. I like the fact that it has a perch. I also like the fact that this one is easier to clean because there aren't really any separate parts to remove. However, if this hangs in the rain, rainwater can get in the feeding holes and dilute the sugar water. Also, the reservoir is larger and has to be fairly full so the hummies can reach the good stuff (although they do have very long tongues), so more nectar is wasted in cleaning it out before it can all be consumed.
If you want a hummingbird feeder, here are my recommendations:
Get a feeder that has lots of red on it and has perches for sitting.
Get a feeder with a smaller reservoir because too much is wasted with a big tank.
If you decide to go fancy/artsy, get one that is small and easy to clean because mold can grow in nooks and crannies.
Get a feeder with an ant moat. This is a place to put plain water to keep ants from walking down the hanger, onto the feeder and getting to the ports.
Get a feeder with bee guards (these are the yellow cages) - although I have not yet seen any bees on the satellite feeder, but there is an ant moat in the middle.
Make your own sugar-water or buy a powder that has no preservatives or food coloring.
Be prepared to clean your feeder every few days in hot weather and to take it all apart if necessary.
We are told that some hummies hang around Central Ohio through October, and the clerk at the bird store recommended keeping feeders out until the hummies are gone because they come to depend on them, especially in the fall as the flowers are fading. She said it is a myth that feeders lure them to stay in the area too long and then they don't get away before the cold gets them. She said they know when to leave for winters in Mexico.
And now, what you've all been waiting for: our very own pics and videos of our little hummies:
Video - 39 seconds with a Hummie - This Hummie is on Hubs' favorite feeder at Old House. It has a very large bottle, and he learned early on not to fill it very full. You will notice how long the tongue is as you watch this!
Here is a still of that same hummie:
These first 3 photos are of a female, and the fourth one is a ruby-throated male. The camera doesn't do them justice.
Hummies also love our zinnias. We believe that the combination of the feeders and the zinnias have kept them around. At Old House, where there are now lots of zinnias and 2 feeders, we can sit outside and watch the hummies for hours. They hang around and go from flower to flower to feeder and back to flower. They also are very territorial, so they will chase each other away from a spot they want for themselves. However, we've seen 2 sit peacefully together on the same feeder, and on the same fencing. I never realized before that they would perch out in the open; I always thought they only perched in protected tree-cover.
I've noticed two styles of feeding. There are the sitting sippers who will perch and sip repeatedly, and then there are the dancing dippers who never land but hover and dip repeatedly. Some always seem to go to one port, and others will try all the ports in a feeder before flying away.
Enough Said stars James Gandolfini and Julia Louis-Dreyfus.
This movie was released in the fall of 2013. Overall, it was well reviewed and won some awards. It is a romantic comedy, and I found it very enjoyable.
Gandolfini plays Albert and Julia plays Eva. The two characters are single and middle-aged, each with a daughter that will be leaving for college in a few months. That commonality gives them something to talk about when they start dating. Albert and Eva meet at a party where they both declare that they don't find anyone there attractive. Later he calls her and asks her out to dinner, and their relationship begins.
At this same party, Eva also meets a woman named Marianne (played by Catherine Keener). Eva gives Marianne her business card indicating that she is a Massage Therapist. Marianne later calls her for a massage, and the two women strike up a friendship.
The basic conflict of the movie is that Eva is building a romantic relationship with Albert at the same time she is building a friendship with Marianne, who just happens to be Albert's ex-wife! Eva figures this out early on in both relationships, but continues to "see" both people. I'm not going to spoil it for you, so if you are curious about how it all works out, you will just have to watch the movie.
One thing I liked about the movie is that all the characters were quirky and real. There seemed to be genuine chemistry between Gandolfini and Louis-Dreyfus which made it seem even more real. There was another layer added to the movie in realizing that James Gandolfini passed away in June of 2013 before the movie was released. As I watched it, I had in the back of my mind that this actor wasn't going to see the movie released which was very sad and made the movie more poignent.
This is one I recommend for a nice enjoyable couple of hours. Nothing heavily dramatic or tear-jerking, but interesting in it's complexity.
If you've seen Enough Said, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
I am guessing that most of my loyal readers are familiar with this movie since it has been advertised a lot in recent weeks. I was lucky enough to see it shortly after it first hit the theatres - I was really looking forward to it.
My readers may remember some movie reviews from earlier this summer - a series of 3 that are "Before..." They were all written and directed by Richard Linklater and stared Ethan Hawke as was Boyhood. The premise of the series of 3 was that they had the same actors playing the same roles but each movie was 9 years later than the previous, so the story was a continuation of the lives of the fictional characters in 9 year increments. Each movie was told mostly in real time, and each consisted of a long conversation between the 2 main characters. The premise of Boyhood is very similar although there is more action, and there are a lot more characters. In this case, the filming was done a little bit every year for 12 years using the same performers. Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette play the parents of Ellar Coltrane and Lorelei Linklater (she is 2 years older than he). The story follows the life of the boy from when he enters school until he graduates 12 years later.
Here are a couple of photos that shows Ellar's aging as the filming progressed:
My viewing companion loved the movie. It seemed to be everything she'd hoped it would be. I, on the other hand was a little disappointed. I love the premise, and I found it very cool to see the actors age over 12 years as they did in real life - it's just not the same when done with make-up. I liked the fact that you have the same actor playing a child and a young adult rather than having to change actors when a child ages. I thought the movie was well made and maintained consistency over the 12 years of filming.
I also liked the fact that it seemed very real. The characters and the story seemed like it really could have been a documentary of the lives of this family. However, I found the movie to be long (almost 3 hours) and a little slow and boring in places. (Honestly, I almost fell asleep.) I was also bothered by the fact that some bits of the story were left hanging. Because they were covering 12 years in 3 hours, there were some necessary jumps ahead in time, but I wished that the transitions could have been smoother.
I would recommend the movie over-all. I think it is worth seeing because of the interesting premise of filming. However, I wouldn't expect it to be a life-changing experience.
If you've seen the movie, please share your thoughts with me! I'd love to hear what you thought!
Thanks for reading, and don't forget to feed the fish.
When I use the word "Lustron", what do you think of? Let me give you some context: think houses.
On Thursday, July 31, Hubs and I visited the Lustron Home exhibit at the Ohio Historical Society. This is something that has been on my to-do list since I first learned about it. There is actually an entire home on display, and the best thing about it is that visitors can walk through the house and open drawers and touch things. It isn't a traditional museum exhibit that is hands-off.
Here is a photo of the front of the house that is on exhibit:
Here is what it might have looked like "in the wild" so to speak:
The Lustron Corporation was here in Columbus in a former airplane factory and was only in business from about 1948-1950. Unfortunately, they couldn't keep up with orders and the company folded after having only built about 2500 homes nationwide. They were advertised as the "new age" home of the future. That they were virtually maintenance free was the main selling point. The house was made out of steel panels, inside and out, and included many built-ins as well. The exterior came in 4 color options: gray, blue, yellow and pink.
Here are some sample living rooms:
At the Ohio Historical Museum, the Lustron House display was complete with a "homeowner" dressed in a 1950 outfit. She talked about the rooms as we toured the house, and also explained the fate of the company. Here is the dining room of the exhibit house:
And then the kitchen:
My favorite thing in the kitchen was the combination dish washer/clothes washer. This was located to the left of the sink. A lid came off the top, and then the home owner would change out the drum inside - putting in either a washing machine drum, or a dish washing drum and rack. Here's an ad for this feature:
I was surprised by how big the rooms were inside. From the floor plans on display, the houses seemed like they would be very small and cramped. There were 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom models available, and I think they all had 1 bathroom. Bedrooms had built in closets with sliding doors, and the master had a built-in vanity as well. There isn't much storage, and they didn't build garages, so if you wanted a garage, you had to have it built separately. The houses were actually a little more expensive than a traditional home, which was one of the negatives.
Here is the floor plan of the model we toured:
Here is a photo of a standard bathroom:
Here are links to a couple of articles about the homes and the exhibit:
The Longest Ride by Nicholas Sparks was released in 2013 and is the 17th romance novel he's written. Production has already begun on a movie based on the book.
I have enjoyed almost all of Sparks' books. Yes, they are predictable, but that's ok. I enjoy the story-telling, and I enjoy the writing style. I found this book to be very engaging, and I looked forward to reading it each day. I was also disappointed when it was over even though I could have predicted how it was going to turn out.
The title refers to several parallel stories. This book is about 2 parallel romances. One is the romance of Ira Levinson and his wife Ruth. As the book opens, Ira has just been in a car accident, and as he languishes seriously injured and alone in the car which is quickly being buried in falling snow, he hears and sees his dead wife Ruth as she comes to him with encouraging words. We learn about their life together and their deep love for each other as he talks to her.
In alternating chapters then we see a parallel love story developing between a young Wake Forest student named Sophia and a bold young rodeo bull-rider named Luke. Eventually, the two stories come together as Luke and Sophia find Ira's car and help him get rescued. "The Longest Ride" is about the love story of Ira and Ruth, but it is also about a bull-riding event that Luke experiences which changes his life. The title is also about love and life in general - it becomes a metaphor for enduring love.
Woven through the story is a sub-plot about a collection of modern art that Ira and Ruth built through their years together. That art collection eventually connects with Luke and Sophia as well.
I recommend this book to anyone who enjoys a good romance novel. There isn't much "steam" to it, but it is very moving at times. Predictable yes, but it's worth the ride as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks for visiting! I hope to see you again soon!
Those who know me well might be surprised to learn that I watched this movie. I have not read the book by author Suzanne Collins because of my philosophical opposition to the plot. The book is about teens killing teens in a twisted futuristic community game not unlike the old short story "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson. I refuse to endorse a story where teens are forced to kill each other to survive. So, I'm not endorsing this movie, nor am I recommending it or the book.
Why did I watch the movie? Good question. I felt I had an obligation to my students to be familiar with it because so many of them have read the book and the sequels and have seen the movies as well (now 3 of them in the series). I have not yet decided if I will invest any more time watching the sequel movies Catching Fire or Mockingjay.
However, for those who have seen the movie, I just wanted to make some observations. The only truly futuristic element of the story is the technology used for communication. Most of the rest of the story harkens back to old times. The lower-class people in the movie who live out in the provinces dress and live in places that look much like pictures we see of 1930 Depression-Era America. Upper-class people who live in a city much like Oz (albeit without all the green or a yellow brick road), live in a 1930's Art Deco world. Even the super fast bullet-train that the characters ride in is all Art Deco in design. Also, the clothing and hairstyles of some of the elite, ruling class pay homage to The Wizard of Oz. I find this design element fascinating. I don't know if it was intentional, but it seems so obvious that it must be?
The story itself also bears some resemblance in structure to a short story called "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, which is much anthologized for freshmen. In this story, one man hunts another in a jungle setting, and uses many of the same techniques that main character Katniss employs as she is being hunted.
So, that's all I have to say about The Hunger Games. Feel free to let me know if you agree or not.
Thanks for reading, and don't forget to feed the fish!
This book was published in 2005, and won quite a few awards as a novel for teens. As is almost always the case, this book is better than the movie - or so I am told - and based on my reading of the online summary, I think it probably is better. I tried to read the book - twice - but I didn't because I just couldn't get into it. The book is narrated by Death. I'm not sure if that is what turned me off or not. I know a few people who loved the book. I also know others who couldn't get into it, like me. So....
I watched the movie by the same title which was released in 2013. I loved the movie, and I can highly recommend it!
The movie is set in a small town in Germany in the late 30s and early 40s, as the Nazis are ramping up their anti-Jewish activity. The main character is a young girl named Liesel Meminger who is taken in by a middle-aged couple as what we might call today a foster child. Her mother has left the country because she is a communist, so Liesel and her brother are being sent to live with this family - only the brother dies en-route. At his burial, Liesel picks up a book dropped by the graveside and keeps it with her even though she can't read it.
At the home of her new family, the father, played by Geoffrey Rush, warms to her very quickly and is very nice to her, while the mother, played by Emily Watson is very cold and distant, at least at first. Liesel starts attending the community school, and it is quickly obvious that she can't read which makes her the laughing stock of many of her classmates. She is befriended by a young neighbor boy named Rudy who becomes her love interest.
Early on in her stay with the Hubermann family, another young man comes to stay with them. This man is Jewish and asks them to hide him. His father had been a good friend of Hans Hubermann. Liesel and the Jewish man Max become good friends. When he is sick, she reads to him to help him keep his brain active.
The title derives from the fact that when Liesel can't yet read, she is fascinated with books and steals a couple because they are so unique to her. Between what she learns at school and what Father Hubermann teaches her, she is quickly able to read and then becomes obsessed with reading everything she can get her hands on.
While the tragedies of WWII do figure into the plot of the movie, I will say there is at least a partially happy ending, so the movie is not unending tragedy. This is not another tragic "Holocaust" movie. I recommend it to everyone! It has action, romance, suspense, history - what more could a good movie have!
Fill the Void was a very interesting movie that I learned about when it was previewed on another DVD I got from Netflix.
This is a movie made and set in Israel and done in Hebrew with English subtitles. It was introduced at the Venice Film Festival in 2012 and was released in the US in 2013. It won seven Israeli Academy Awards.
The plot is very simple. As the movie begins, a young couple is expecting a baby (couple is back right in the photo). The mother dies and the child is born. The family then proceeds to look for a new wife for the baby's father. Younger sister (age 18 - back left) of baby-mother is suggested and considered. Most of the plot of the movie is the debate over whether this is a good match or not. I'm not going to tell you what is decided.
There were several things I found interesting about this movie:
1 - I've never seen a movie set in Israel, so the scenery, home decor, etc... was new and interesting to me.
2 - Even though the movie was modern, the culture of the family of Haredi Jews (ultra-Orthodox) still has arranged marriages in the 21st Century. It is interesting to consider the pros and cons of this life-style choice that an entire culture still clings to.
3 - It was a bit strange to me to see a man dressed in Orthodox Jewish clothing pull a cell phone out of his pocket, or drive a modern car on a busy street.
Would I recommend this movie? It is not very "active" - nothing very dramatic happens. It's certainly not a romance or a comedy. The acting is good for what the story is. I think its biggest asset is that it offers a window into a different culture for most modern Americans.
If you watch it, please let me know what you think!
It isn't often that I rate movies with 5 stars, but I did so with this one. This movie is a wonderful mix of suspense and romance and ends up being a real tear-jerker.
Stars are Kate Winslet and Josh Brolin. Kate was nominated for a 2013 Golden Globe for her leading role.
The basic story is that Brolin's character Frank has escaped from prison. He asks Henry and his mother Adele to help him by hiding him for a few hours until dark when he will flee. Over the few hours that they are together, the 3 of them bond, and he ends up not fleeing after all. They spend the Labor Day weekend together and make plans to run away together as a family to Canada.
I can't give any more details than that without giving away spoilers. I highly recommend this movie. I found it engaging and very well done. It is set in the 1980s with flashbacks into the 70s. Settings are Massachusetts and New Hampshire. If you like suspense and romance, you will enjoy this movie! Check it out, and let me know what you think!
Thanks for reading, and don't forget to feed the fish!
On Thursday, July, 10, 2014, Hubs and I got to do something we've been looking forward to doing for months, and it was FABULOUS! We went to The Columbus Zoo!
My local readers know that in May the Columbus Zoo opened its newest exhibit, The Heart of Africa. This region of the zoo is huge and features an African savanna complete with a wide variety of animals native to Africa. There is a large viewing area for humans to observe the animals in their "native" habitat. (Ok, it is AS "native" as it can be in central Ohio.) Here is a list of animals featured in this exhibit:
Aardvark (or earthpig)
Giraffe (both Masai and Reticulated)
Blue neck ostrich
Guineafowl (these are very noisy little creatures!)
Visiting this new exhibit was our #1 priority for this visit, so we went there first after arriving at the zoo at 9 am. Very close to the zoo entrance is a free tram that takes visitors out to this region.
The first thing to see are the Dromedary Camels - and it is possible to RIDE them! (Sorry, I don't remember if there is a charge for this.) Check out these adorable shots:
Next is the Mudiwah village with some shops. Much of what is featured in this gift shop are items made in Africa. Some of the cooler items are only available at this shop, so if you see something you want, I suggest you get it while you are in this region. More common items like plush animals and small mass-market stuff can also be purchased at the zoo's main gift shops.
There is also a restaurant called Mapuri which is open to the savanna, so you can watch the animals as you dine.
Moving on to the other animals.... Featured in this section are cheetahs, the fastest animals on the planet. At certain times (I think 10ish), they do a demonstration showing how fast these kitties run. Whoosh!
The ostriches like to hang out in a gang. If something spooks them, they all run together. It is funny to watch them run - you can hear their feet pounding the ground!
There is also a keeper-talk about the aardvark (maybe around 10:30 ish?).
Then there are the lions... 2 females and a male. While we were there, they were napping. As part of their exhibit is an old-time plane- maybe from the '30s - that supposedly has landed (crashed?) in the savanna. Part of the plane is in the lion's area, and the other part is exposed to the public and set up so kids can get into it and play with the buttons and levers. Very cool - the kids we saw were loving it! The lions think the plane is cool too -literally - because the part they are by is air-conditioned for them. Check out the sleepy kitties:
There are a bunch of guineafowl that run around in groups. They squawk very loudly and can get annoying. In fact, they annoy the giraffes and will keep the giraffes away from the viewing station if the birds are up by the people.
There are also some vervet monkeys. Their area is set up like an old tent area for a researcher. The little monkeys are very cute.
And then there are the GIRAFFES! I've been saving the best. We have about a million giraffe pics, so picking the best to share is difficult. I'll start with the main reason we went - to feed them.... In the viewing area, people can feed lettuce leaves to the giraffes on the odd hours staring at 9 (although I don't know who can do that since the park doesn't open until 9). We got out there about 9:30, and then ended up getting in line for the 11:00 feeding about 10:30. There is plenty to look at while waiting in line! I'll cut to the chase. Here are the best feeding pictures.
I will be happy to send pics of me feeding one to those of you whom I know - just let me know you want to see them! I'm also going to post some videos to a Youtube channel, and I will send that link to anyone who asks as well.
Here are some more general cute giraffe shots:
This one at the left is the one I fed. Her name is Cami and she is smaller than the others. There are 11 giraffes in the herd here, but there were only about 6 or so out when we were there.
The giraffes are up close to the viewing area, but most of the other animals wander out on the savanna, and some are hard to see. I'm going to take binoculars the next time I go. Here are some other animals on the savanna:
A herd of wildebeest:
Greater Kudu and .... stork?
After we left the African area, we headed next to the polar bear exhibit where there is an underwater viewing station to watch the bears in the water. It was hard to get good photos here because of the glare on the glass. It's almost as if this polar bear knew he was showing off for people with cameras!
Then there were the Alaskan Moose. 3 of them:
And reindeer.... this guy was all alone - not sure if he had been bad? The other reindeer were in a different pen - maybe they were all female and they were separated to keep them from ..... well, you know....
A couple of giant tortoises - here's one:
A Humbolt penguin - this was one of a few that were not molting:
There is a prairie-dog habitat, and the little pups are just adorable! They pop up out of their burrows and run around digging and chasing.
The buffalo was molting:
The swan was working on decorating her nest:
The manatees were hanging out on the bottom of the tank:
and this okapi was just hanging out being his cute self:
So, that's it - most of our trip to the zoo. We walked way more than we intended to, but the 5 must-sees on our list were spread out pretty far (giraffes, manatees, moose, penguins, elephants). We left home at 8:30 and got home about 4, and we were exhausted! I must say, we saw more strollers in one day than we've seen in our entire lifetimes!